The authors of GLEP #41 made the changes to the GLEP's wording as requested by the council during October's meeting. Thus, it was brought to vote. Before I relieve you of the suspense of the vote's outcome, let me say that a policy decision also came about as a result of last night's vote. GLEP 41 was never resubmitted to this mailing list (gentoo-dev) after the wording changed. Most of the council members were uncomfortable with this idea. That was the first and *only* time the council will vote that way again. Following this, every resubmission must be discussed on -dev for 7 days minimum before being resubmitted to the council 7 days before that meeting. As such, GLEP 41 was voted in by majority (only one dissenting vote). The subdomain for the arch tester email aliases has not been decided (it is beyond the scope of the council's role in the GLEP). The last agenda item was a summary of the progress of portage signing as presented by Marius Mauch (genone). The story is dismal -- no progress has really been made because nobody has taken ownership of implementing it yet. Thus, the Council decided that its members would scratch the beginnings of the GLEP together and forward that GLEP to the original participants/proposers in the prior discussion (which was carried out last year under the old metastructure management). From there the GLEP will be presented to -dev for discussion before the Council takes further action on it. The Council has agreed to forward their scratch GLEP to the original proposers/partcipants before December's Council meeting.