I've been nominated, and I've accepted (after bribery of beer :P). I'm also a current Council member. I'm not going to tell you why you should vote for me, as I'm not a politician. I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to do if I was voted back in because I don't have a game plan as such. And when it comes right down to it, it *is* a popularity contest. Or rather who would you trust the most to make decisions you agree with. So you're really voting for someone like-minded and is probably more eloquent and vocal than yourself. I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my technical decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even mentally) in the few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev. Thanks Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:25 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't > consciously seen any, I rarely see you take part in any discussions. Maybe that's because -dev wasn't a forum for technical discussion. Hopefully that might change. > So your refusal to say anything about what you have in mind is rather > problematic to me and probably others. What did you want me to say? I don't have anything planned beyond what I already do (which is baselayout, some base system foo, dhcpcd, Gentoo/FreeBSD on x86 and sparc) Or should I make up some crap just to get votes? Sorry, won't do that. I *will* say that I will continue to work on what I'm doing to make Gentoo a better place. > On this basis, I can't and won't vote for you. That's your prerogative. You do know that we use a Condorcet voting system which means you rank candidates instead of voting for them? Thanks Roy