GLEP 81: User and group management via dedicated packages
|Author||Michał Górny <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Michael Orlitzky <email@example.com>|
|Posting history||2019-05-29, 2019-07-08, 2019-12-10|
A new approach for user/group management is proposed. Regular packages in dedicated categories are used to represent and create user and group accounts. Dependencies are used to request users and group from within regular packages, and to track their usage.
- The policy part was removed from the GLEP, in order to make it a tree policy. The GLEP is now purely technical specification.
User management in Gentoo is currently ad-hoc. Users and groups are created through calling system tools directly in packages needing them. There is no systematic way of tracking which packages need specific users or groups, and determining which ones are obsolete. Coordinating properties of users and groups used by multiple packages must be done manually by developers.
GLEP 27 originally attempted to address the problem. Posted in 2004, it never had reached the reference implementation state, and became obsolete. 
A good system user and group management proposal should address:
- Tracking usage of users and groups, and determining which ones are obsolete.
- Sharing users and groups reliably between different packages.
- Maintaining fixed UIDs/GIDs that are consistent between different systems.
- Providing local overrides for user/group properties.
- Ensuring that users and groups are not created unnecessarily at build time.
- Providing support for centralized account management (e.g. LDAP).
At the same time, the proposal should avoid unnecessary complexity to avoid sharing the fate of GLEP 27. This proposal aims to address those points without requiring a new EAPI or any changes in the package manager.
In this proposal, system users and groups are represented by regular packages. Those packages logically represent the ownership of the respective users and group, and technically implement their creation.
User packages are placed in acct-user category. Each user package defines the properties of the particular user, and must be named after the user it creates. It must depend at build and run time on the groups the user belongs to.
Group packages are placed in acct-group category. Each group package defines the properties of the particular group, and must be named after the group it creates.
All user and group packages must define preferred fixed UIDs/GIDs, and they must be unique within the repository. The packages should indicate whether the value needs to be strictly enforced, or whether another UID/GID is acceptable when the user exists already or requested UID/GID is taken.
Packages needing a specific user or group use dependencies to pull the required user/group packages. If the user is needed at build time, a build time dependency (DEPEND) must be used. If the user is needed at install and/or run time, a run time dependency (RDEPEND) must be used.
The primary technical function of user and group packages is to create the users and groups. This is done via invoking the respective system tools at pkg_preinst phase. This is done only if the user/group does not exist on the system already.
If the user or group exists already, the package performs necessary modifications in order to meet requested properties. This includes updating user's home directory path (but not moving the directory itself), shell and/or group membership. However, UID/GID is not modified.
The package must not remove users/groups. When the account is no longer needed, the tooling must ensure that it is locked from access. Appropriately, the packages must be able to reenable users when they are installed again.
Additional tools may be provided to help users remove groups and users. However, such actions need to be explicitly confirmed by the system administrator.
Home directory ownership
If the user in question uses a regular home directory (i.e. not /dev/null), the user package should maintain the directory via keepdir command. This allows for clean removal of the home directory if it is no longer needed. The package manager will also apply correct permissions if the directory does not exist yet.
Note that since the user is not created until pkg_preinst, the permissions to home directory should not be applied earlier than that.
Tracking of user/group usage is done through dependencies. As long as any installed package depends on a specific user/group package, the respective user/group is assumed to be used. If no package requiring the specific user/group is left, the package manager automatically prunes the package clearly indicating it is no longer used.
Each user and group has a single respective package creating it. If multiple packages need it, they depend on the same package. This ensures that all properties are kept in a single location, and do not need to be synced.
Having a single location with all predefined user/group ranges makes it possible to maintain fixed UID/GID definitions. This GLEP makes allocating them obligatory. While this isn't enforced for existing users, it provides a way forward for new installations.
Local overrides can be trivially implemented via local repository, through overriding the respective user/group ebuilds. The proposal also respects direct sysadmin modifications.
Avoiding unnecessary user/group creation at build time is implemented via correct dependency types. While this was possible with the status quo, the dependency model should be more natural to developers and cause less mistakes.
The original proposal attempted to remove user/groups automatically when the respective package was unmerged. This required verifying that no files are owned by the user/group in question which was both expensive in terms of I/O, and fragile.
This GLEP follows the best practice of leaving obsolete user/groups accounts while ensuring that they are locked out properly. This guarantees that no files with stale ownership are left (e.g. on unmounted filesystems) and that the same UID/GID is not reused for another user/group.
This GLEP preserves backwards compatibility with the existing method of user/group management. Both methods can coexist as long as necessary for the transition period, and the same user/group can be governed by both in parallel.
However, some of the advantages will only be reliable once the old method is phased out, and only on new installations. This particularly applies to fixed UIDs/GIDs.
The reference implementation has been committed to the Gentoo repository in the form of acct-user.eclass and acct-group.eclass. Initial user and group packages have been created in order to test the concept.
|||GLEP 27: Portage Management of UIDs/GIDs (https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0027.html)|
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.